🔗 Share this article Federal Government Poised to Send Dozens Government Officers to San Francisco The White House was preparing on Wednesday to dispatch numerous of law enforcement personnel to the San Francisco Bay Area for a large-scale border security initiative, triggering criticism from California leaders. Specifics of the Mission Information of the deployment were still emerging, but it will reportedly include approximately 100+ federal agents, based on information. The personnel are expected to begin occupying the US Coast Guard base in across the bay, across the bay from San Francisco. It remained unclear whether state soldiers would participate. Political Response The operation is the result of weeks of warnings by Donald Trump to target the liberal city. Governor Gavin Newsom denounced the action, calling it “straight from the authoritarian playbook”. “He dispatches unidentified officers, he sends out border agents, he deploys federal agents, he creates concern and apprehension in the neighborhood so that he can take credit for solving that by dispatching the national guard,” he declared. “This mirrors the arsonist putting out the blaze.” Municipal Preparation San Francisco is the most recent large urban area singled out by the administration's initiative of widespread apprehensions. The deployment is anticipated to provoke a standoff between the administration and city officials who have vowed to prevent militarized immigration enforcement in the city. San Franciscans have been readying for an extended period for Trump to carry out repeated threats to dispatch personnel to the city. At a Wednesday afternoon press conference, San Francisco’s mayor emphasized that the city was ready. “For months, we have been anticipating the likelihood of some kind of national intervention in our city,” declared the leader, explaining that he had taken further executive actions on Wednesday to “bolster the city’s support for our newcomer populations, and guarantee our agencies are prepared prior to any national intervention.” Legal Framework Regardless of court battles to deployments in a several municipalities, including the Windy City, Oregon and Los Angeles, Trump has asserted “unquestioned power” to send the military forces in cities, pointing to the federal statute which enables presidents specific authority to deploy troops on American territory. Public Preparation Newsom, who was formerly as San Francisco’s mayor – had committed to intervene “immediately” to a mission in the city. “The idea that the federal government can deploy troops into our cities with no justification grounded in reality, no oversight, no accountability, no consideration of local authority – it’s a direct assault on the rule of law,” he said on Wednesday. Public associations, including social justice nonprofits created during the initial federal leadership, have prepared to rapidly assemble a large protest in the city, as well as candlelight gatherings at community centers. Local Impact In San Francisco’s Mission area, a predominantly Latino community, elected official informed journalists last week she and her residents had been preparing for this moment. “The moment that workers cease employment, when people of color are afraid to go outdoors without the concern of government officers racially profiling and arresting them, the moment when families keep children home, grow too frightened to go to the supermarket or doctor,” she said. “The readiness efforts in the Mission is fundamentally a halt the likes of which we have not experienced since the health crisis.” Military Situation Approximately several hundred out of 4,000 state state soldiers continue under national command under an command from Trump. Roughly several hundred of them had been dispatched to the Pacific Northwest, where they were remaining in uncertainty amid a legal battle over their deployment. This period, Newsom said he had requested the local soldiers under his command to operate charity kitchens amid the federal closure.